Previous Entry Next Entry
Today's top story: blah blah blah
[info]felixwas
The lead story in the local newspaper tonight splashes across five columns at the top of page 1 and continues at the top of page 2. It’s about how three County Legislature committees reviewed the proposed county budget yesterday but didn’t make any changes to it.

At least, that’s what the first paragraph said. I read that paragraph and thought, “Why would anybody continue reading?”

As somebody who loves newspapers, stories like this bother me. This story is all about process; it’s written for the politicians, not for the readers. It’s also full of numbers presented without meaningful context. After reading it, I have no idea how much the typical homeowner’s taxes will increase if the budget is passed as it stands. Nor do I have any idea how all of the proposed spending programs outlined in the story could affect my taxes.

And after wading through a swamp of direct quotations from a discussion about who should pay to run the county’s only airport (a matter that is far from resolved), I finally stumbled upon an issue that truly affects readers: how budget pressures are resulting in less maintenance of county roads. But it’s buried in the final two columns of the story; I guarantee most readers fled in boredom long before that point. And, naturally, all the talk about the roads is from politicians or county employees; there’s nothing there from people who drive the roads regularly and might know something about their deterioration: school bus drivers, say, or truckers, or state troopers who patrol the roads.

In her now-infamous column, Maureen Dowd of The New York Times criticized her then-colleague Judith Miller, saying something like “Investigative reporting is not stenography.” Delete the word “investigative,” and the idea still applies.

Newspapers wonder why they’re losing readers. It’s simple: Because they’re not printing much that people want to read. And that doesn’t mean newspapers have to pander to readers by filling their pages with fluff. Just take a look at all the political discourse found on blogs. There’s an appetite for Serious Stuff. But too many reporters have forgotten the recipe.

Says Denny Wilkins: "Stop being tape recorders."

[info]cwmackowski

2005-11-16 02:06 pm (UTC)

Considering the amount of space and prominence the paper gave the story, the editors obviously considered the story important--so why doesn't the writing reflect that?

Unfortunately, in a small-town newsroom environment, where already-overworked reporters are required to pump out a quota of by-lined stories, it's all they can do to play tape recorder, let alone take their reporting to the next level of synthesis and analysis.

And so we all suffer...or we give up on newspapers. I don't know about you, but I'm not much into masochism, so guess which option I chose?

(P.S. -- That band you're listening to is HOT!)

Re: Says Denny Wilkins: "Stop being tape recorders."

[info]felixwas

2005-11-16 02:18 pm (UTC)

Instead of spending all the time and energy to write a "tape-recorder" story, all the reporter really needed to do here was come back and tell his boss that nothing of substance happened at the meeting. Then, the two or three hours that it took to write the story that nobody will read can be devoted to reporting and writing a story that people WILL read. I maintain that readers simply aren't interested in all the "blah blah blah," bafflegab, bureaucratese and political posturing that occurs at public meetings — and we all know such meetings ARE NOT where the real deals get done. Readers are interested in actions and consequences. Reporters need to get their butts out of the board rooms and quit yakking on the phone to the usual suspects. Instead, they need to get out into the world and talk to real people. And this simply isn't going to happen unless management has enough foresight and imagination to insist on it. It really comes down to three little words: change or die.

Re: Says Denny Wilkins: "Stop being tape recorders."

[info]drdenny

2005-11-16 10:14 pm (UTC)

Is this my official "15 minutes of fame"?

Re: Says Denny Wilkins: "Stop being tape recorders."

[info]cwmackowski

2005-11-17 02:44 pm (UTC)

Not to worry: If you don't get your fifteen minutes of fame, you can rest assured that you will at least live on in infamy forever.

I've also noticed a partisian take both left and right where the papers play to their audiences. NPR and Fox news are great examples of this in the electronic media. I myself, although I'm a conservative Republican, tend to read periodicals like Nation, Utne Reader, The Progressive, and other magazines of the liberal ilk. I don't read conservative news sources at all, because I'm secure in my belief structure, and have a strong desire to see what the left has to say.

Aloha,

Jeff

Careful, Jeff. It can be dangerous to admit to having an open mind.

You are viewing [info]felixwas's journal